You are here

compatible

You got 11 of 11 possible points.

Your score was: 100 %

Question Results

Score 3 of 3

Question:

Multiple choice question

Incompatible comes from the word compatible which means that two things go well together. Incompatible means that things do NOT go well together.For example:

My computer does not support this new computer program: It is incompatible with my laptop.

This square shape is incompatible with the round hole.


	disagree with each other
	exist in harmony with each other
	two things or people conflicting with each other
	cannot work together

Which answers are closest in meaning to incompatible? Choose the 3 correct answers.

Response:

	disagree with each other
	two things or people conflicting with each other
	cannot work together
	exist in harmony with each other

Score 3 of 3

Question:

Multiple choice question

The examples below illustrate the meaning of incompatible.


	a dog and a cat
	a cat and a mouse
	a lion and a lamb
	a man and his dog

Which answers are examples of things that are usually incompatible? Choose the 3 correct answers.

Response:

	a cat and a mouse
	a lion and a lamb
	a man and his dog
	a dog and a cat

Score 3 of 3

Question:

Multiple choice question


	don't like to do the same things.
	enjoy being together.
	argue a lot because they are very different from each other.
	are not happy together.

Which descriptions below best explain the meaning of incompatible? Choose the 3 correct answers.

A husband and wife who are incompatible...

Response:

	don't like to do the same things.
	enjoy being together.
	argue a lot because they are very different from each other.
	are not happy together.

Score 2 of 2

Question:

Multiple choice question

Read this paragraph and answer the question below.


	The ability of future generations to survive.
	The disappearance of natural resources.
	The fact that the world's population is growing.

Different People, Different Views

There are different views regarding the growth of the world's population. Paul Ehrlich argued that population growth must be controlled to prevent natural resources such as clean air and water, forests and oil from being used up. This would cause hunger and poverty for future generations. Ehrlich's solution was to suggest that people should have fewer children.

Julian Simon, in contrast, argued that a growing population is good for the world. He was sure that an increase in population would also increase human talent, which would find a solution to the problem of limited food and energy. He was not worried about the disappearance of natural resources.

On which points are Simon’s and Ehrlich’s views incompatible? Choose 2 correct answers.

Response:

	The ability of future generations to survive.
	The fact that the world's population is growing.
	The disappearance of natural resources.